southsamurai

Yeah, if that’s the person making the choice, that’s a good thing

looks at Ed Currie

looks at McIlhenny

Okay.

Well, yeah, archive is the answer.

Look dude, nobody owes you, or anyone else, the work of going through and copy/pasting random comments they made ten years ago. Why would you even think that’s a reasonable expectation?

For one, reddit doesn’t even make it realistic because they limit how many comments you can actually go back through. The automated stuff has the same limit.

Seriously, why the fuck does anyone think that they’re entitled to not only the answer, but to the person doing the extra work it would take to move it? That’s some next level narcissism right there.

Me?

I’d go for the one that fit the “vibe” the best. If everyone can do the job itself equally, you step down to the people you think are going to mesh well with everyone else (and yourself). 10k a year is a small price to pay if picking the other one is less likely to result in a smooth workplace.

After that, if those were as equal as guesswork can be, I’d look at things like proximity that might make one or other more reliable on a day-to-day basis, and if it was the higher pay request, try and negotiate. Again, that’s guesswork.

But the point is that if you look at the qualifications for a job when considering pay, it can end up costing as much or more in hassles, or be a gain that exceeds the monetary price tag in other ways.

Then again, I likely wouldn’t be in charge of hiring unless it was my own business. As an employee stuck in a hiring position, the choice would be based on policy, and a company big enough to hire and pay people to do hiring isn’t going to think the way I think.

This isn’t an attempt to counter your position, it’s just an explanation of my priorities because it’s an interesting question.

Bollocks!

If they want to hire cheap, they’ll end up getting cheap work.

We live in a capitalist trap, and they suck for not paying a fair wage in it.

No, no, it isn’t the person that did anything wrong.

Be angry at reddit for fucking over their users and laying claim to what those users wrote as reddit’s property.

Fuck leaving up anything that supports a company like that

I mean, if you want pizza that’s even shittier than chain deliveries, sure, you can do that.

Let’s be real. A home oven and premade dough might be cheaper, but it ain’t good pizza.

You can get a pizza stone (or steel), or do a cast iron pizza and end up fine, that’s for sure. But if you’re using that premade dough, even Caesar’s is going to be as good. That’s not mentioning that the sauces available in jars aren’t all created equal at all, or that it’s a dice roll if the cheese is okay or not.

Even dominos and pizza hut are better than a cheap home made pie. You want a good home made pizza, you’re spending roughly the same, but now you have to learn how to hey it right. The learning curve isn’t horrible or anything, but it’s there.

Most people that want a pizza want something decent, or they’d just throw in a digiorno’s or whatever. Mind you, calling most chain pizza decent is a stretch of the term, but that’s another issue entirely since a solid pizzeria isn’t exactly a guarantee outside of cities

When you say we, I think you should probably replace it with democrats.

Because that’s true. If you’re going to stay part of the system that led to this, there’s nothing you can do

But, you know, maybe find other options.