data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/082ee/082eef5ca3ba55ea86e33875573eaf4594d5b81f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/027aa/027aa6a727c71a01b6c95e42d165f77cd287d242" alt=""
Onus probandi.
You make the claims, you serve the proof. You can’t point at a vague, general direction and go “here, proof!”. Especially not a social media feed, that’s the most subjective, volatile “proof” you could provide.
Quote me the text, in its full context, where it says that Mozilla is selling the data they are “now collecting”, or that it was optional for them without degrading services. Because I can’t find it.
All I see is data that Mozilla is required to collect to provide existing services, they are now putting it in black on white. I don’t really care what the “general opinion” is, opinions do not automatically become facts once sufficient people hold them.
I’ve seen Mozilla do bad stuff, this is just a very standard privacy policy update. Let’s criticize them when they actually deserve it, and encourage them the rest of the time.
Also, nice strawman instead of simply answering my question. 🥰
You: “Public opinion is tanking, so it must be true!”
Them: Provides detailed, sourced information that explains the situation
You: “Nerd, I don’t read that shit”
Are you following your emotions or are you truly trying to understand the changes? You seem to be attacking / strawmanning people left and right in this thread and are generally not interacting in good faith.