It does not fork anything. Right now, it uses already existing fedora / oci images.
- 0 Posts
- 15 Comments
It says
Codeberg is a non-profit, community-led effort that provides Git hosting and other services for free and open source projects.
enemenemu@lemm.eeto Open Source@lemmy.ml•Trusting Open Source: Can We Really Verify the Code Behind the Updates?8·26 days agoYou might be interested in reproducible-builds.org or f-droid.org/en/docs/Reproducible_Builds
enemenemu@lemm.eeto Open Source@lemmy.ml•Organic Maps successfully migrates to Forgejo after GitHub blocks them211·28 days agoVisibility :/
enemenemu@lemm.eeto Open Source@lemmy.ml•is there something about rust which precludes copyleft licensing?4·28 days agoI am no dev of rust.
My guess:
- they didn’t want to scare anyone.
- They really think that MIT is free and that anyone shall do with it whatever they like. They are not afraid that someone takes the rust code base and produces a proprietary fork and make money from it.
enemenemu@lemm.eeto Open Source@lemmy.ml•is there something about rust which precludes copyleft licensing?6·29 days agoYou are allowed to license your code change under gpl, you do not have to use MIT just because the package author uses MIT. You can use GPL.
You can also use MIT or no license at all. it does not force you to use MIT
enemenemu@lemm.eeto Open Source@lemmy.ml•is there something about rust which precludes copyleft licensing?62·29 days agoYou could say that, yes.
It makes sense to suggest MIT license for a MIT project
MIT is better than proprietary. MIT does not force you to not make your project free.
enemenemu@lemm.eeto Open Source@lemmy.ml•is there something about rust which precludes copyleft licensing?22·29 days agoIt’s kind of the default in the docs
SPDX license expressions support AND and OR operators to combine multiple licenses.1
[package] # ... license = "MIT OR Apache-2.0"
Using OR indicates the user may choose either license. Using AND indicates the user must comply with both licenses simultaneously. The WITH operator indicates a license with a special exception. Some examples:
MIT OR Apache-2.0 LGPL-2.1-only AND MIT AND BSD-2-Clause GPL-2.0-or-later WITH Bison-exception-2.2
When I started out (I don’t write Rust but other languages), in my first years, I liked gpl and after a couple of years I got to know MIT and I started using that because I thought it is “more free”. I wasn’t aware of the consequences immediately. Once I read the GNU philosophy and started reading more about free software, I started using gplv3 again
enemenemu@lemm.eeto Open Source@lemmy.ml•An open source, off-grid, decentralized, mesh network built to run on affordable, low-power devices3·1 month agoI was curious. Not mocking you :)
I could imagine living in a valley, or an alpine hut.
enemenemu@lemm.eeto Open Source@lemmy.ml•An open source, off-grid, decentralized, mesh network built to run on affordable, low-power devices7·1 month agoWhat’s a/your use case?
I run grapheneos since a couple of years and I love it.
enemenemu@lemm.eeto Open Source@lemmy.ml•Boycotting FOSS projects in the wake of the "buy canadian/european" movement makes no sense12·2 months agoPeople should pay for foss. Donations are oftentimes welcome
What is a ssh client?
A terminal? Termux from fdroid is good. Trrmuy from g store is not so good
Why?