Article: https://proton.me/blog/deepseek

Calls it “Deepsneak”, failing to make it clear that the reason people love Deepseek is that you can download and it run it securely on any of your own private devices or servers - unlike most of the competing SOTA AIs.

I can’t speak for Proton, but the last couple weeks are showing some very clear biases coming out.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It might be that they’re equating the name with the app and company, not the open source model, based on one of the first lines:

    AI chat apps like ChatGPT collect user data, filter responses, and make content moderation decisions that are not always transparent.

    Emphasis mine. The rest of the article reads the same way.

    Most people aren’t privacy-conscious enough to care who gets what data and who’s building the binaries and web apps, so sounding the alarm is appropriate for people who barely know the difference between AI and AGI.

    I get that people are mad at Proton right now (anyone have a link? I’m behind on the recent stuff), but we should ensure we get mad at things that are real, not invent imaginary ones based on contrived contexts.

    • ImFineJustABitTired@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Most people aren’t privacy-conscious enough to care who gets what data

      I assume most people who pay for proton don’t fall into this category

    • JOMusic@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yeah it’s a fair call, but to me it is the very context of why people are made at Proton that makes me suspicious of articles like this.

      I can’t find the original summary post someone made, but here’s the last response from Proton CEO. Read the comments as well to get a good summary: https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtonMail/comments/1i2nz9v/on_politics_and_proton_a_message_from_andy/

      TL;DR: Proton used their official accounts to share CEO’s pro-US-Republican thoughts as their official stance. They since apologized and said they would use personal account to share those thoughts. But (IMO) now having posted this blog on the actual Proton website, it says to me that there are some serious bias alignment issues with a company that is supposed to be a safe-haven away from all of that.

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Here is a general write up about the CEO showing their maga colors.

      More happened in the reddit thread though that added some more elements, like the ceo opting for a new user name with “88” in it (a common right wing reference), his unprompted use of the phrase “didnt mean to trigger you,” him evasively refusing to clarify what his stance actually was because “that would be more politics,” on and on. You can read through that thread here, although proton corporate are mods, so i have no idea what they may have deleted at this point.

      The thread was full of “mask on” behavior that is pretty transparent to anyone experienced with the alt right on the internet.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Thank you so much! That was way beyond what I could have hoped.

        I’ll read the link you provided in a bit, but that does sound really bad. Must suck to work at a company you think is helping people stay private only to have the CEO come out as pro-fascism.

        • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          No problem mate. The thread is a mess, but if you read the comments below the top pinned one, you’ll see most of the salient points that pissed people off. The “color” i mentioned above came from all over that thread, with some of it deleted. I know he edited/deleted the “triggered” comment when he was called out, but he never expanded on why he claimed the GOP was the “party of the little guy” and why all the “corporate dems needed to be thrown out” to get anything done. He also opted not to respond at all to people asking why he thought the party of tech billionaires was suddenly going to crack down on tech billionaires besides saying he really liked J.D Vance, a tech millionaire whose political run was funded by, get this, tech billionaire Peter theil.

          Dude fawned very publicly over tech billionaire maga, who will do clearly do nothing for privacy and monopoly busting, while pretending that the real issue is chuck shumers and establishment dems.

          The bias is clear and prominent.

          • Telorand@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I wasn’t a customer of theirs (I’m always skeptical of super-popular-anything), but I think I’ll look elsewhere for secure email.

            Not because of this article, which I think makes some decent points, but because I would worry in the back of my mind that the Officers of the company would happily bow to their demigods and start secretly tracking people as a show of fealty.

    • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      it is certainly that. but recently its become very trendy to hate Proton, so its just easier to do that instead of thinking. I’m really disappointed in this community