• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Help, I can’t tell the difference between the different varieties. Between the “Ultimate 2 Bluetooth Controller” and the “Ultimate 2 Wireless Controller,” which one do I want for gaming on Linux (both Steam on my desktop and RetroPie on my Raspberry Pi)? Or which do I want between the “2C Bluetooth” and “2C Wireless,” for that matter?

    (Damn it, 8bitdo, would it kill you to put a fucking comparison matrix on your website‽)

    • Yeahboiiii@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The only difference I could find is that the bluetooth one is officially switch compatible and the other one isn’t. I have the old wireless one with hall effect sticks and had no issues with it on pc, android or steamdeck.

    • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Sometimes they have hall effect sticks, sometimes they don’t. Sometimes they have back paddles, sometimes they have extra bumpers instead. Which is which? no clue

    • helpmyusernamewontfi@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I can’t tell the difference between the different varieties. Between the “Ultimate 2 Bluetooth Controller” and the “Ultimate 2 Wireless Controller,”

      The wireless controller uses a wireless USB dongle for connectivity, which supposedly has way less input delay than standard bluetooth. I couldn’t comment on that personally tho cause I have an older one which is Bluetooth and works fine for me

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        19 hours ago

        But both models say they have Bluetooth, wired, and 2.4Ghz connectivity. They both include a USB-C 2.4Ghz dongle, and both explicitly call out Bluetooth as a way to connect to certain devices, so must both have transmitters for that, too. The “Wireless” version calls its wireless protocol “8Speed” and lists its low latency as a feature, but the “Bluetooth” product page doesn’t say anything that would imply its non-bluetooth wireless is different. It merely doesn’t discuss it.

        The only real hardware differences I’ve been able to discern so far are that:

        • the “Ultimate 2 Wireless” version shows colored labels on the ABXY buttons, while on the “Ultimate 2 Bluetooth” version the labels appear to be white.
        • the “Ultimate 2 Wireless” comes in black, white, and purple while the “Bluetooth” version only comes in black and white.
        • the “Ultimate 2C Wireless” comes in mint, peach, green, and purple while the “2C Wireless” version comes in blue, pink, and dark blue.
        • BossDj@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          It looks like they’re each compatible with different devices maybe

        • Azzu@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I have 2C wireless and there is no Bluetooth to be found.