• Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Ok, so you’ll agree that in the meantime people need to stop traveling then? Right? RIGHT?

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      How far is traveling? What means do you find acceptable? And until when do you mean?

      Do I need to wait until I have access to a totally renewable train to go to the nice beach that’s a 90 minute drive away? What about the 25 minute drive to the flooded salt quarry that gives everyone a rash due to the stunning population of migratory waterfowl? The 15 minute drive to the park on the river with a vaguely unsettling murk to the water?

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Hey, you just mentioned a bunch of destinations that you don’t need to use a plane to go to, good job, enjoy them!

        Air travel is the issue, not traveling.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          you’ll agree that in the meantime people need to stop traveling then?

          You’ll have to forgive my confusion and understand why I might have thought you had an issue with travel in general. Writing off trains and boats didn’t help either, nor saying that people who wanted to focus on alternatives to air travel were in favor of destroying the environment.